What are some signs of the prophesied End Times?

What is the most important sign of the End Times?

Missions: The heart of God

When will Jesus return?

"This Good News about the Kingdom will be preached through all the world for a witness to all people; and then the end will come." -- Matthew 24:14 (Good News Translation)

End Times predictions

Throughout Christian history, believers have speculated that the prophesied End Times were just about to start. Some audacious ones have even set specific dates. Several years ago, for example, radio preacher Harold Camping had people talking about his declaration that the present world order would end in May of 2011. When that did not happen, Camping revised his prediction forward a few months to October. By the way, he had earlier set 1994 as the year when End Times would arrive.

In 1988, a best-selling book by former NASA engineer Edgar Whisenant predicted that the Rapture of Believers would happen that year in September. One-time presidential candidate Pat Robertson had predicted it for 1982. The Jehovah's Witnesses' last calculation for the end of history as we know it indicated 1975 would be the year. Herbert W. Armstrong, the founder of the Worldwide Church of God, predicted End Times would begin in 1972.

All those predictions were wrong (long list of erroneous End Times predictions). Almost none of those people touting a precise timetable seem to take into account Matthew 24:14. People predicting End Times dates usually focus on things like wars, increasing wickedness, and natural disasters. They talk about bad things like the increased fierceness of storms, the surge of killer viruses, severe famines and droughts, and escalating tensions between nations.

Matthew 24 and the End of Times

They rarely point to Jesus' words in Matthew 24:14 in which He said the ultimate End Times sign is the preaching of the gospel to all people.

One question to be raised about Matthew 24:14 is: What exactly does it envision? Does it mean getting the gospel to every single person on earth? The term translated as "people" in Matthew 24:14 is plural and thus could or should be rendered as "peoples." In this sense, Matthew 24:14 could mean having a viable Christian witness within every single ethnic and people group.

To be sure, whatever is envisioned, great progress has been made in accomplishing that task. The Good News of Jesus Christ is being preached today in more places around the world than ever before. Nonetheless, we still have a ways to go. At least 5,000 distinct people groups have no viable church-planting movement in their midst.

Many of the doomsday "signs" which people seize on are things that generate fear. The sign Jesus gave in Matthew 24:14 -- the gospel being proclaimed everywhere -- should do the opposite. The thought of all people hearing clearly the Good News should generate delight at what will happen as we approach End Times.

If Matthew 24:14 is true, then declaring the Good News to the ends of the earth is not something optional. It has to be accomplished. Will we be an obedient part of making it happen?

Discussion questions

  1. What are some common signs that people often associate with the End Times, and how do these differ from the sign that Jesus gave in Matthew 24:14?
  2. How important is the global spread of the gospel in the context of the End Times, and what role do Christians have in ensuring that this message is proclaimed to all peoples?
  3. How have previous failed predictions of the End Times impacted people's understanding and belief in these prophecies?
  4. How should we interpret the meaning of "people" in Matthew 24:14, and what implications does this have for the global spread of the gospel?
  5. How can the thought of all people hearing the Good News generate delight and hope, rather than fear or anxiety, about the approaching End Times?

1Note: In the Bible, the word "nations" does not mean political entities like China, India, and the USA. Rather, it means people groups or societies in which people speak the same language, have the same culture, and live in or have originated in the same area. "Nations" is thus synonymous with the plural word "peoples." In other words, nations in the Bible means all of the world's people groups other than the people of Israel.

    -- Howard Culbertson

This mini-essay on a world missions Bible passage is one of more than three dozen articles in the "Heart of God" series published in Engage, a monthly online magazine. That series explores what the Bible says about missions.

Rel;ated Article

More for you on Matthew 24:14

Is the worldwide preaching of the Gospel a sign that we are in the End Times?

Modern global missionary outreach: an eschatological sign?

An in-depth theological essay

Is there a connection between world evangelism efforts and Christ's Second Coming?


Eschatology — Derived from Greek and literally "discourse about last things." (1) The branch of theology concerned with the end of the world or of humankind. (2) A belief or a doctrine concerning the ultimate or final things, such as death, the destiny of humanity, the Second Coming, or the Last Judgment.

Etymology: Greek eskhatos

Other forms: eschatological — adjective
eschatologically — adverb
eschatologist — noun


What is the message of Matthew 24:14?

Many Christian believers are passionate about linking current events to biblical prophecies. Other Christians are as equally caught up in world evangelism efforts that seek to reach the unreached. Are those two groups of passionate people on separate tracks that will never meet?

Some time ago, Ralph Winter, then-head of the U.S. Center for World Mission, lamented: "For some reason, Christians often make little connection between discussion of prophecy and future events, and discussion of missions" (Winter, 1). Earlier, following the 1966 Congress on the Church's Worldwide Mission held in Wheaton, Illinois, Arthur Glasser had said it even more clearly: "Books galore are being written on being delivered from the Tribulation, but nothing significant on the relation between Christ's return and the church's worldwide mission" (Glasser, 2).

Need confirmation of these two men's complaints? You need to look no further than the pages of the classic best-seller The Late, Great Planet Earth. In what became an extremely popular treatment of prophecy and the end times, author Hal Lindsey made no reference to missions or to worldwide gospel preaching.

Is there any connection that can be made between current efforts to make disciples and plant churches in every single people group and the Second Coming of Christ? Yes, there may well be. A dearth of literature on the relationships between End Times and the church's attempts to fulfill the Great Commission does not mean we are going out on a shaky limb if we try to connect the two subjects. The connection between End Times and world evangelism is a very solid (and Biblical) one. The connections are so solid that Swiss Lutheran theologian Cullman has asserted: "The proclamation of the Gospel as an 'eschatological sign' is not a peripheral phenomenon" (Cullman, 49).

One of the clearest biblical connections between world evangelism and eschatology is Jesus' message on the Mount of Olives, which is commonly called the Olivet Discourse (Matthew 24, Mark 13). Jesus' disciples wanted to know some specific details about the future. They asked Jesus the question: "What will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?" Jesus begins His answer by discussing religious and international conditions that will prevail and natural disasters that will occur (famines and earthquakes), wars, false prophets, and apostasy. Then Jesus moves away from the bad news to a definitive and positive sign: "And this gospel of the kingdom will bepreached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations"1 (Matthew 24:14).

What Jesus meant by that phrase has been the subject ofdebate. What does "preached" mean in this context? How do we measure "in the whole world"? What does "as a testimony to all nations" mean?" What will be the measuring stick of fulfillment for that prophecy?

Well, scholars are not in agreement on the answers. In fact, during the research for this essay, I began to think that Southern Baptist Seminary professor A.T. Robertson was right when he called the Olivet Discourse "the most difficult problem in the Synoptic Gospels" (Robertson, 187). Evangelist and author William McCumber said that the interpreter's task has, unfortunately, been made even more difficult "by those who are cocksure of its detailed meaning, and in their zeal for a particular interpretation have sometimes made their tradition a test of orthodoxy, and even of fellowship" (McCumber, 183).

It is beyond the scope of this essay to answer every question that can possibly be raised regarding Matthew 24:14. However, I do want to explore the principal schools of interpretation regarding the timing of events and the agents of the prophecy's fulfillment. I want to attempt to answer the question: Does Matthew 24:14 refer to the present mission of the church?

The answers which scholars have given to that question have varied greatly. Still, they can be gathered into three general categories:

  1. Those who understand Jesus to have been referring to first-century, pre-A.D.-70 evangelization
  2. A premillennialist view with roots in dispensationalism that says Jesus was foretelling a brief period of world evangelization that would occur following the rapture of the church.
  3. An interpretation that sees Jesus as referring to the present worldwide missionary activity of the Church.

Let's look at these three possibilities. As each interpretation is outlined, the possible implications for a theology of mission will be considered.

One additional point must be made before launching into our main subject. Biblical scholars are divided over the extent to which the words of Matthew 24:14 are original to Jesus. Tackling that issue is beyond the scope of this essay. Let us simply take the judgment of London Bible College professor Donald Guthrie as a presupposition. Guthrie wrote: "In the absence of any positive evidence to the contrary, it is reasonable to conclude for the authenticity of these sayings" (Guthrie, 23). Having said what we're going to assume about the authenticity of the passage, let us look at the meaning of the text itself.

Is Matthew 24:14 a post-rapture prophecy?

Is it possible that, in Matthew 24:14, Jesus was referring to an event that would take place in a very brief period of time? In his writings, Floyd Filson did not push any particular when interpretation of Matthew 24:14. Still, he made a pertinent observation on what the verse may be saying. He noted: "Such a world mission, which seems long-lasting to us, is here (as in Matthew 28:19) considered the work of a generation" (Filson, 254). Those who would agree that Jesus likely had in mind a time frame limited to one generation or less have two possible schools of interpretation from which to choose:

  1. The belief that Matthew 24:14 was fulfilled by first-century Christians in the period following Pentecost and before Jerusalem fell to Titus in 70 A.D. This view, which would see Matthew 24:14 and Matthew 28:19-20 strongly linked together, is worthy of some further consideration.
  2. The belief of a within-one-generation fulfillment at the end of time. Fitting into a dispensational understanding of the Scriptures, this view asserts that Matthew 24:14 refers to events that will occur in the brief Tribulation period following the rapture of the Church. As might be expected, proponents of this point of view envelop Matthew 24:14 with the dramatic symbolism in the book of Revelation.

Each interpretation of Matthew 24:14 centers on a particular word or phrase used by Jesus in that verse. For example, the futuristic and premillennialist view — that the global proclamation occurs following the rapture of the church — places great emphasis on the last phrase of Matthew 24:14: "And then the end will come."

What might Matthew 24:14 be saying to us today?

Those who subscribe to a post-rapture interpretation of Matthew 24:14 do not agree on whether there is any connection between the mission of the church today and this Tribulation period proclamation. There are those who see this phrase as indicating a "finishing up" of world evangelization after the Church is taken away. They see the words of Matthew 24:14 as speaking of a tidying up to ensure "the ends of the earth" spoken of in Matthew 28:19-20 have been reached. Others understand Jesus to have been predicting a distinct kind of gospel preaching effort that will be totally separate from that being done by the Church today.

  1. Finishing what the Church has started. The following two quotations will illustrate this finishing-the-job point of view. The word completed in both quotations indicates the continuity being posited between current world missionary outreach activity and a post-rapture proclamation.
    "Many hold that the evangelization of the world will be completed following the rapture of the church before the great tribulation" (Harold Lindsell, 45).

    "The witness may not be completed until after the Church is taken away and this other heavenly messenger (Revelation 14:6) proclaims the everlasting gospel" (W.E. Blackstone, 134).
    Such a view, of course, has some limited implications for a theology of missions. This point of view does make clear that God's will shall not be thwarted by human beings, and that the spread of the gospel is not necessarily subject to whatever limitations today's Christians might have. On the other hand, such a post-rapture interpretation of Matthew 24:14 does not infuse urgency into a theology of missions as do some other interpretations of the passage.
  2. A new and distinct phenomenon. Some see Jesus as foretelling a gospel preaching which will be a distinctly Tribulation period phenomenon. Early dispensationalist Arno Gaebelein was one of those who insisted no connection should be made between what the Church is doing in world evangelism today and the prophecy of Matthew 24:14, "The answer of our Lord to His disciples," he asserts, has nothing "to do with this Christian age" (Gaebelein, 51).

To be sure, any worldwide proclamation of the gospel is a glorious and wonderful thing. If, however, it is to be a Tribulation period phenomenon, then Matthew 24:14 has virtually nothing to say to the missions strategist.

Who might be the preachers in a Tribulation period proclamation scenario?

If Jesus was referring to a Tribulation period preaching, then obviously, the Church as we know it is not to be involved. So, the question is: Who will do this proclamation or preaching? At least three possible agents have been advanced. Homer Kent of Grace Theological Seminary lists two of them. He asserts that Jesus was foretelling that the gospel message "will go into all the world during the Tribulation through the efforts of the two witnesses (Revelation 11:3-12) and the sealed remnant of Israel (Revelation 7)" (Kent, 86).

1. Human beings as preachers. After the Church has been taken away, there are those who insist that God will continue to use human beings as gospel heralds. Some hold that this worldwide proclamation will be done by the tribulation saints, those people who will be converted by believing in Christ after the Rapture of the Church. Others, basing their arguments on chapters six and seven of Revelation, see this preaching as being done by converted Jews. David Cooper, the founder of the Biblical Research Society, is one of the representatives of this latter view. He explains Matthew 24:14 this way:

When the Great Tribulation is upon the earth, according to this prediction, (the gospel) will be proclaimed to the whole world in the short period of those troubled times. Who will do this vast amount of preaching? In the light of God's announced purpose and in the clear light of past history, we must conclude that the Jews will do it (Cooper, 62; cf. Gaebelein, 51).

2. Supernatural messengers. Fuller seminary professor Ladd noted that one contemporary school of interpretation views Matthew 24:14 as meaning "an eschatological proclamation by angels" (Ladd, 114). Such a view would hold that a literal fulfillment of the "angel flying in mid-heaven" of Revelation 14:6 would be what Jesus had prophesied in Matthew 24:14. To be sure, Ladd hastened to say he did not endorse this interpretation. His hesitancy to do that, Ladd said, derives in part from the specific Greek wording used in the parallel passage in Mark 13.

Others have seen the two martyred witnesses of Revelation 11 as being those who will fulfill the worldwide proclamation prophesied in Matthew 24:14. In trying to identify the two witnesses, some have suggested it means Old Testament personages such as Moses and Elijah who come back to earth to preach for the 1,260 days mentioned in Revelation.

Even writers like Methodist dispensationalist W. E. Blackstone seem to want to cover all the bases. In his exegesis of Matthew 24:14, Blackstone threw in every possible preaching/proclamation agent, setting up a veritable parade of participants. Here's how Blackstone thought these words of Jesus were going to unfold. First, he saw the Church as the present agent in the fulfillment of Matthew 24:14. He believed that, following the Rapture, the fulfillment of Matthew 24:14 would continue with the preaching being done by tribulation saints, to be followed by converted Israel. "Lastly," wrote Blackstone, "it is to be a heavenly messenger" (Blackstone, 233).

Was Matthew 24:14 fulfilled prior to 70 A.D?

A. A view with an impressive pedigree

A totally different perspective on Matthew 24:14 is that it refers strictly to first-century A.D. events. Those holding this view see Matthew 24:14 as being fulfilled by the extraordinarily aggressive evangelistic outreach that characterized the first few years of the Church's history following the Day of Pentecost.

While the previously discussed school of interpretation built its understanding on the last phrase of Matthew 24:14, the proponents of this view have looked to the word oikoumene as being the key to understanding what Jesus meant. Both John Wesley and Adam Clarke, for example, held to the position that the use of this particular word in the original Greek limited Jesus' meaning to the Roman Empire. That would mean the task was completed in the first or second century (Wesley, 113; Clarke, 818).

Methodist theologian Milton Terry rephrased Matthew 24:14 in the past tense this way: "After the Gospel of the Messianic Kingdom had been preached in the whole Roman world, for a witness to all the nations of the same, the end of that age came" (Terry, 553). This view would find support in verse 34 ("This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled") and would understand the word telos (end) to be referring to the destruction of Jerusalem by Titus in 70 A.D.

This view would coincide with the realized eschatology of Oxford and Cambridge professor C.H. Dodd and probably even with the symbolic eschatology of men like Paul Tillich (Harvard University and University of Chicago) and Niebuhr. Albert Schweitzer, who held that Jesus expected the end of the world to come within His own lifetime, undoubtedly could agree with this school of interpretation. Seeing Matthew 24:14 as having already been fulfilled was what Martin Luther and other early leaders of the Reformation believed. Those Reformers, said Lutheran missiologist James Scherer, subscribed to "the belief that the apostles had already essentially completed the task of preaching the gospel to all nations" (Scherer, 64).

Alexander Bruce, a Scottish Free Church theologian, believed that Jesus was giving the disciples another version of the Great Commission. He explained it this way:

The disciples were not to be mere spectators of the tragedy of the Jewish nation destroying itself. They were to be active preaching the gospel of the Kingdom, propagating the new faith, bringing in a new world (Bruce, 290).

In fact, A.W. Argyle — Regent's Park College tutor at Oxford — believed that this was the interpretation put on Jesus' words by the Christians of the first century as they participated in the spread of the Gospel (Argyle, 182). Proponents of this pre-70 A.D. fulfillment quote Paul as writing by A.D. 60 that the gospel "has been preached to every creature under heaven" (Colossians 1:23 RSV). Acts 2:5 and 8:4 are used as support, as well as Paul's quotation of Psalm 19:4 in Romans 10:18 ("Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world").

If Matthew 24 is taken as focused exclusively on the destruction of Jerusalem (and, indeed, some of it unquestionably does), then the preaching/proclamation referred to in Matthew 24:14 cannot refer to the present mission of the church. If it was fulfilled in the first century, then the only contribution of this passage to a theology of missions would, at best, be that of a historical illustration of God's people carrying the message.

B. A dual-fulfillment possibility

The biblical interpreter continually faces the danger of divorcing a phrase, a verse, or even a passage from its biblical context. Certainly, the question of the disciples itself at the beginning of the chapter plus the way in which Jesus develops His answer could well point to a first-century fulfillment with "earth/world" (oikoumene) being used in its restricted meaning of the Roman Empire and "end" (telos) meaning "end of the age."

While accepting this interpretation, some biblical scholars have not been content to leave it there. Among them is German Protestant scholar Johann Peter Lange. Lange argues that, on the basis of the complete context, Matthew 24:14 "must not be limited to the Roman world". Then he goes on to observe that it is unnecessary to assume an either/or interpretative stance on this verse (Lange, 424). David Aune has picked up on this theme saying that Matthew 24:14 can be understood as containing "two aspects of fulfillment, one of which belonged to the apostolic age, while the other belongs to the imminent future of the church" (Aune, 76).

Such a dual-fulfillment possibility, compatible with the inaugurated eschatological school of interpretation, has often been applied to many Old Testament prophetic passages. Nazarene Theological Seminary professor Ralph Earle noted this and urged the application of this same "telescopic feature" in the interpretation and understanding of Matthew 24. "These predictions of Jesus," he said, "referred first to A.D. 70, but in their final and full significance, they reach forward to the end of this age" (Earle, 56).

Almost all of those who would hold to the dual-fulfillment interpretation of Matthew 24:14 would see the second fulfillment as occurring in the present missionary outreach of the Church. This would not exclude those who look for a different kind of fulfillment in the Tribulation period, but the research for this essay did not uncover anyone holding that particular dual-fulfillment position.

The implications for a theology of mission on the part of the proponents of a dual-fulfillment interpretation would best be understood in the context of the material dealing with the present mission of the Church.

Is Matthew 24:14 going to be fulfilled by the current mission of the Church?

The third major grouping of the understandings of Matthew 24:14 is that which applies Jesus' words to the present worldwide mission of the Church. This is, naturally, the most attractive interpretation for the missiologist. Seen from this point of view, this verse becomes what Grant Swank calls "the challenge of Jesus to the Christians of today" (Swank 1974: 37).

Former missionary to China and Fuller Seminary professor Arthur Glasser represents those holding this position when he comments:

When Jesus was asked for eschatological signs, He gave none. Instead, He pointed to the new thing that would characterize the age from Pentecost onward — the church's preaching of the good news as a witness to all nations (Glasser, 48).

If this was what Jesus meant, then Wilhelm Andersen was right in asserting that the "missionary enterprise is an eschatological entity" (Andersen, 58). Seeing the strong relationship between the advent of Christ and the preaching of the gospel to the uttermost parts of the earth has caused Phillip Teng, Christian and Missionary Alliance pastor in Hong Kong, to refer to today's missionaries as the heralds of the Parousia — a clear reference to the substantive "preached/proclaimed" (kêruchthêsetai) (Teng, 201). Note: Parousia, a Greek word that means "presence," is often used to refer to Christ's Second Advent or Second Coming.

One would expect missionaries to be quite happy with this understanding of Matthew 24:14. It would be wrong to conclude that they are the only ones saying we are today seeing the fulfillment of this prophecy. They have plenty of company, and respectable company at that. It is a view quite compatible with both the inaugurated and the teleological schools of eschatological interpretation. It would certainly be the preferred understanding of the postmillennialists (without excluding, on the other hand, any of the other millennial views).

A. Arguments from Scripture

1. The immediate context of Matthew 24. Those who hold to the view that Matthew 24:14 refers to fulfillment through the ongoing missionary outreach of the Church must deal with the fact that, in other verses of Matthew 24, Jesus clearly alludes to historical events that happened in the First Century A.D. There is no easy way to break up this chapter into sections, as one topic seems to fade into another and then comes back into focus again.

It has been argued that Jesus' purpose in His response to His disciples was not to give them a detailed, sequential chart of events. Rather, He was offering general answers, utilizing the literary style of other apocalyptic literature in which, said A.E. Harvey of Oxford University, "the drama is not made to unfold in an orderly progression, but the description keeps turning back on itself to fill in details belonging to an earlier phase" (Harvey, 93). Thus, just because Jesus does clearly prophesy some First Century events in Matthew 24 does not necessarily mean that all the events mentioned in this chapter must take place within that time frame. A. T. Robertson took an illustration from the art world to explain what he believes Jesus is doing: "In a painting, the artist by skillful perspective may give on the same surface the inside of a room, the fields outside the window, and the sky far beyond" (Robertson, 188).

Then, it must be noted that Jesus seems to be telling His followers what they should look for. This would seem to support a pre-Parousia fulfillment rather than one that takes place after the Rapture of the Church (i.e. Jesus' followers). Horace Fenton Jr. of the Latin American Mission and the framers of the Frankfurt Declaration are in agreement that the larger context in which the verse is found clearly has Jesus saying that this prophesied preaching would take place before His return, not after (Fenton, 63; Beyerhaus, 292).

2. Other related biblical passages. What about the other biblical passages that have been quoted in connection with the two other main interpretative points of view? Do any of these offer serious obstacles in interpreting Matthew 24:14 as meaning the present worldwide mission of the Church?

Well, proponents of present-day fulfillment through missionary outreach join the advocates of a Tribulation period fulfillment in making references to the book of Revelation. In his New Testament theology book, University of Nottingham professor Alan Richardson relates Matthew 24:14 to the horsemen of Revelation 6 and 19, asserting that "the missionary activity of the Church itself is one of the signs of the end" (Richardson, 27). George Eldon Ladd said it even more clearly: "The conquering white horse parallels Matthew 24:14 and pictures the victories to be won by the preaching of the gospel in the world" (Ladd, 623).

Cambridge professor H.B. Swete sees a connection between Matthew 24:14 and the two witnesses described in Revelation 11. Then he goes on to affirm that "the witnesses represent the Church in her function of witness-bearing" (Swete, 134; cf. Harvey, 813 and Plummer, 290). Actually, the phrase that the beast "shall make war" against the two witnesses would be strange wording if it only applies to two specific individuals. Groups make war against each other. Conflicts between individuals are described with different terminology.

As for the angel in Revelation 14:6 who preaches "to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people," Henry Halley, in his popular Bible handbook, argued that this passage could well be a "picture of our modern era of worldwide missions" (Halley, 727). Halley also saw a connection between Revelation 7 and Matthew 24:14. Here, he injected the further possibility of a dual-fulfillment aspect, saying that Revelation 7 refers "to the process of evangelization going on in the Roman Empire before it fell, or in the whole world throughout the whole course of history" (Ibid., 714).

We have already seen that John Wesley opted for a First-Century fulfillment of Matthew 24:14. However, he did not assert, as some have, that Paul was announcing such a fulfillment in Colossians 1:23 ("which was preached to every. creature which is under heaven"). In his explanatory notes, Wesley wrote that Paul was saying that the gospel had "already begun to be preached to the whole world" (Wesley 1950: 744). And indeed, since the form of kerusso here is the aorist participle, it should not be pushed too hard as far as its tense meaning is concerned. John B. Nielson, former head of European Nazarene College, saw the meaning of the phrase as being "designed for declaration to all mankind" (Nielson, 386), turning global gospel proclamation into a possibility rather than a completed actuality. Free Methodist missionary and seminary professor Howard Snyder picked up on this line of reasoning and referred to this verse in his discussion of the Church's present "prophetic function" (Snyder, 107).

It also seems far-fetched to say that Paul's quotation of Psalm 19 in Romans 10:18 is his way of announcing the fulfillment of Matthew 24:14. The passage in Psalms is set in poetic language rather than precise documentary wording. J. Barmby, a British scholar writing in the Pulpit Commentary, said of Psalm 19: "The Psalm itself cannot well be understood as intimating the universal proclamation of the gospel. Nor is it necessary to suppose that St. Paul so understood it" (Barmby, 295).

Thus, we may conclude that none of the related biblical passages in the Bible present obstacles to understanding Matthew 24:14 as a reference to the modern missionary movement. On the contrary, many of these passages can be used as strong support for just such an interpretation.

B. A current events viewpoint

In trying to understand what Jesus meant by this particular sign, H.D. McDonald of the London Bible College looked at the whole package of indicators given by our Lord in Matthew 24. Then he summarizes:

"In the first age of Christianity, the buds of most things in the Church's history appeared: the success of Gospel preaching, anti-Christian tendencies, persecutions, heresies, schisms and the rest. When they reach their legitimate issue, then shall the end be" (McDonald, 119).

It seems natural to look at all of these things together. None of the other "signs" in Matthew 24 seems to be a unique phenomenon that will only begin to appear just before the end times. So why try to force this one into a new mold with the interpretation that it must be a distinct tribulation phenomenon fulfilled by some special group of messengers?

In trying to understand Matthew 24:14, some have looked to the extremely rapid expansion of the missionary enterprise in the last two hundred years. "Is it not impressively significant," asks Blackstone, "that the missionaries sent forth during this century have seemingly without any human supervision, been impelled to go to every land, island, nation and tribe of the earth?" (Blackstone, 234). [ see missions timeline ] Blackstone and others would see the heightened missionary consciousness of today as the work of the Holy Spirit in bringing to the fulfillment this particular prophecy (see, for example, Earle, 20 and Smith, 20).

C. Language used

  1. oikoumene (world/earth) — In certain contexts, the Greek word oikoumene does not refer to anything beyond the boundaries of the Roman Empire. That happens in Matthew's narrative of Jesus' birth, for instance. However, this is not always the case. In both Hebrews 1:6 and Revelation 3:10, the meaning of oikoumene is clearly the whole inhabited earth. "It is certainly not to be linked (in Matthew 24:14) with political imperial style. The reference is simply to the glad message which is for all nations and the whole earth" (Kittel, vol. V, 158). On the other hand, Greek scholar Kenneth Weust believes the verse is yet to be fulfilled while also believing that oikoumene in this passage refers specifically to the Roman empire. Thus, we find Weust having to translate oikoumene here as "the future revived (Roman) empire" (Weust, 63). That all seems quite unnecessary. Furthermore, the use of ta ethne instead of oikoumene in the parallel verse of Mark 13 and its usage later in Matthew 24:14 itself would certainly seem to point to a broader meaning of oikoumene. It is ta ethne that is also used in Matthew 28:19-20. There, the context seems to point to all peoples everywhere.
  2. telos (end) — Each of the three groupings of interpretations of Matthew 24:14 which we have analyzed has assigned a slightly different meaning to "end." A first-century fulfillment would have telos signifying the breaking of one era and the beginning of a distinctly separate one. The Tribulation period interpretation would identify telos as referring to a cataclysmic end of the present creation. Such a view would place more emphasis on the usage of sunteleia (completion/consummation) in the question of the disciples (Matthew 24:3) than on Jesus' use of telos when He answered them.

    Telos is much less specific than sunteleia. It can mean the end of a particular process, a goal that has been reached. That seems to be the most appropriate meaning to apply to Jesus' words here. As The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament notes, "The context suggests the Parousia" rather than the destruction of Jerusalem or even the end of the whole world (Kittel, vol. VIII, 55). Interestingly enough, it is telos that is used in Revelation 21:6 where Jesus says, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end."
  3. Kêruchthêsetai (will be preached/proclaimed) — The verb kerusso — in various forms — is used 60 times in the Greek New Testament. In every other case, it refers to human messengers. There's every reason to believe that it has the same meaning here rather than shifting to talking about angels or some entity other than human beings.

    Matthew 24:14, it must be noted, is not couched in apocalyptic imagery. Rather, it uses straightforward language exemplified by these three words we've touched on. This factor would tend to mitigate against a Tribulation period fulfillment, strengthening the idea that it is being fulfilled by the ongoing present mission of the Church.

How do we arrive at a conclusion regarding what Matthew 24:14 is saying?

Whichever of the three interpretations one accepts of Matthew 24:14, Jesus' words are a hard blow against Jewish exclusiveness. This change in the direction of the flow from all nations flocking to Mount Zion to the taking of the message out to all nations would make an excellent subject to explore in another study.

If we accept a present-day fulfillment-in-progress (which may be the most probable interpretation), the question must be asked: Is the missionary outreach of the Church just a sign of the coming Parousia? Or it is a sign of the final consummation of time? Is Christ's second advent some kind of sign that the Church has fulfilled its mission? If it is, can we, therefore, conclude that the timing of the Lord's return depends in some way on what His followers do?

This essay has majored on the when? (timing) and the who? (agent) of the fulfillment of Matthew 24:14. It has only briefly treated the where? (target). Many questions remain to be explored, including: How extensive and how intensive is this proclamation to be? What exactly is meant by "for a witness"?

It is clear from this one verse in Matthew's gospel that the apocalyptic event is not something for spectators. There is to be active involvement and active involvement in an enterprise that will reach its goal. At this point, one can raise the question of how much of an imperative mood Matthew 24:14 is. Is it only a simple foretelling? Or does it also contain elements of an imperative?

These are all questions that merit additional exploration as the Church seeks to understand this ray of hope shining in the middle of a message that otherwise seems filled with gloom.

What do Jesus' words about End Times toward the end of Luke 21 mean for us today?

Musings on what thinking about End Times should cause us to do

The Antichrist

Luke 21:25-31, 34-36

25 "There will be signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea. 26 People will faint from terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies will be shaken. 27 At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 28 When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near."

29 He told them this parable: "Look at the fig tree and all the trees. 30 When they sprout leaves, you can see for yourselves and know that summer is near. 31 Even so, when you see these things happening, you know that the kingdom of God is near. . .

34 "Be careful, or your hearts will be weighed down with carousing, drunkenness and the anxieties of life, and that day will close on you suddenly like a trap. 35 For it will come on all those who live on the face of the whole earth. 36 Be always on the watch, and pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to happen, and that you may be able to stand before the Son of Man."

Week 18 (May)

I'm not old enough to remember Hitler or Mussolini or Stalin being labeled as the prophesied Antichrist. But I'm told it was done by many sincere evangelical Christians.

Years have gone by. History has proved those speculations wrong. The three men have long since died. That should teach us something. There is danger in thinking we can match up with certainty specific historical events and the biblical signs of the Second Coming such as Jesus gives us in Luke 21. [ essay on Matthew 24:14 ]

Dogmatic interpretations of prophecy, which later turn out to have been erroneous, can destroy our credibility with others. Such mistaken dogmatism can even, over time, dull the keen edge of our own expectancy of Christ's return.

Attempting to foretell the future by interpreting current events is not a disease peculiar to the Church. In his library, my father-in-law had a book titled How to Prepare for the Coming Crash. Published in 1971, that book insisted that a worldwide conspiracy of bankers would force us into a chaotic economic depression in 1972 and no later than 1973. What happened? Well, the author read the signs wrong.

That people who try to foretell the future make such bad guesses need not prevent us from thinking about the end times. We are certain that Christ is coming again. And His coming is imminent, although we cannot necessarily be certain that it is immediate.

While we were on our first home assignment during missionary service in Italy, a couple of people asked me: "Since you live in the Mediterranean area, aren't you able to see quite clearly the fulfillment of many end-time prophecies?"

I must confess that I do not spend much time trying to match news reports with prophetic passages in the Bible. Sure, when books by Hal Lindsey and Salem Kirban were popular, I read some of their stuff. However, I did not share their confidence that they could match current newspaper headlines with biblical prophecies.

Really, I'm not even capable of arguing a definitive position in the pre-millennialism and post-millennialism controversy that was strongly contested by some early leaders of the Church of the Nazarene.

What should be our attitude toward the end times and the Second Coming of Christ? Well, first of all, Jesus is coming again. That is definite. And I anticipate it with hope and joy.

Then Jesus seems to be saying in the account in Luke 21 that we should not let the worsening of world conditions get us down. Jesus said things would get bad, but that's the time to "stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near." (Luke 21:28).

The most important effect the biblical teaching on the Second Coming has on me is not the ability it gives some people to spin elaborate theories and construct timetables. Rather, it is in the incentive it gives me for holy living. In fact, in Luke 21, Jesus tells us that we should in ways so that we will be, as the King James Version puts it, "accounted worthy...to stand before the Son of Man" in the end time.

Jesus is coming again. When? I don't know. But I do want to be worthy!

Discussion questions over Luke 21

  1. What does Jesus' warning about being weighed down by the anxieties of life mean for Christians today?
  2. How can Christians avoid the mistake of trying to predict the timing of the Second Coming while still anticipating it with hope and joy?
  3. How does Jesus' message in Luke 21 about the signs of the End Times relate to the current global situation?
  4. Why should we put a priority on living a holy life in preparation for the Second Coming?
  5. How can Christians maintain their expectancy of Christ's return without embracing dogmatic interpretations of biblical prophecies?

    -- Howard Culbertson,

I wrote these devotional thoughts on Luke 21 while Barbara and I were serving as missionaries in Italy. They were published in Standard, a weekly take-home curriculum piece for adult Sunday school classes produced by what is now The Foundry.

Afterword: Some Cautions

More for you from Luke

Recommended links