Gives light: John 1:4-9, 8:12, 9:5, 12:35, 46, 1 John 1:5-7, Revelation 21:23
Gives eternal life: John 17:2
Confers spiritual gifts: Ephesians 4:8-13
Receives worship: Matthew 14:33, Luke 24:51-52, Acts 1:24, 7:59-60, Hebrews 1:6,
What rights and prerogatives did Jesus have? Powers and privileges belonging solely to
Yahweh are claimed by Jesus for Himself.
Jesus said he was Lord of the Sabbath: Mark 2:28
Jesus claimed to be the final judge of all human beings: Matthew 7:21-23, 13-41-43, 19:28,
25:31-33, Mark 14:62, Luke 9:26
What about Jesus' repeated use of "I AM" -- "I am
the shepherd"; "I am the door"; "I am the truth"; "I am the way; I am the life; I am the vine; I am
the resurrection and the life; I am the root and offspring of David, and the Bright Morning
Star"? Would not each of those "I am" statements have reminded His Jewish listeners of the
"I AM" statement by God to Moses in the desert?
Jesus was crucified because the Jews understood him to be
saying he was God. To them that was blasphemy and as a result they engineered his crucifixion.
His disciples understood what Jesus was saying as well. That's why they picked up the Old
Testament Hebrew word Adonai which is usually translated into English as "Lord" and used it
for Jesus. The use of Lord as a title for Jesus when that same word is used a few hundred
times in the Old Testament as a title for Yahweh makes a
strong statement for Jesus' divinity.
;In John 20:18 Mary Magdalene is quoted as
saying, "I have seen the Lord." In Greek, she uses the word -- "kurios"-- which is clearly
used of God the Father in Acts 7:31: "The voice of the Lord came to Moses."
Kurios is also the same word used for God the
Father in such passages as Philippians 4:5, 2 Corinthians 8:21, 1 Thessalonians 3:3, 2 Timothy
2:24, Hebrews 13:6, 1 Peter 1:25, 1 Peter 2:3, 2 Peter 3:9, James 1:7, James 4:10, and Revelation
When Paul refers to Jesus over and over again as Lord (the
same word in Exodus 3:35 which you quoted), it is clear that he understood Jesus to be saying He
was God (for Paul, there is only "one Lord.").
We in the 21st century can try to rationalize away the Early
Christians' conviction that Jesus of Nazareth was God incarnate. However, it is clear that Jesus'
followers used the title "Lord" for Him in the same way that they used "Lord" for God the Father.
In his writing, John especially emphasizes the deity of Christ. Sit down and read all the way
through the Gospel of John and his three letters in one sitting. If you do that rather than just
focusing on isolated scraps of Scripture, you will come away with the sense that John is intent on
demonstrating that Jesus was indeed God.
Jehovah's Witness question: How could the Word be with
God and be God at the same time? When you find a sensible answer to this question, let
My answer: You've asked an excellent question. John 1:1 is one of the most finely
crafted verses in the entire Bible. Try to put aside your theological lens for a moment and just
look at how the verse is worded. See how its three phrases build to a climax. The first phrase of
the verse proclaims the eternal pre-existence of the Word ("In the beginning was the
Word"). The next phrase defines the relationship of the Word to God. Then the last phrase
establishes that the essential nature of the Word is Deity ("The Word was God"). Verse
two then comes back to state again the eternality of the Word -- such eternal pre-existence is, of
course, a quality unique to God.
By looking at things written during Bible times by Greek
and Jewish philosophers, we know that ancient writers used "the Word" to signify the
Divine Mind. Wouldn't that mean God Himself? In fact, Philo, well-known philosopher who
lived during the time of Christ (approximately 20 B.C. to 50 A.D.), used logos (the Word) to
mean the sum total of all Divine energies. It's no accident that John picks up and uses that very
same word -- "logos" (or "the Word"). When he uses logos, John is signaling to his
readers that he is talking about the Creator Yahweh.
The potency of this Scripture verse does not come from the
words with God or was God. The potency centers around John's use of "Word."
To the ancient Greeks, logos (what we translate as "word") was
not just speech or reason.
Logos or "Word" was at the center of the Greek understanding
of the existence of the
universe. The logos could not be dated in time. The logos was what released
creative and constructive forces. There's an echo of this in the verses of Genesis 1 which have
God speaking the universe into existence ("And God said, Let there be . . .'"). This idea
is what John picks up on and uses to demonstrate the eternal pre-existence of Jesus and to show
that He was in fact the eternal Creator God.
Your question actually centers on the second phrase of that
verse: "the Word was with God." Let's look at that phrase. The Greek preposition
pros has some nuances that may not be fully communicated by our English word "with."
What John was trying to say with his phrase "with God" is much more than merely "being
near" or "beside."
As they read what John wrote, his original Greek-speaking readers would have understood the
idea of living union in the phrase "with God." While readers of the English Bible may tend to
think "with God" means physically "being near," John wrote that the divine Word not only lived
with the Father from all eternity, but was joined to the Father.
The chapter introduced by the words of John 1:1 declares
three things about "the Word:"
He who was in the beginning became in time.
He who was eternally joined to the Father came and lived among human beings.
He who was God became flesh.
All three of these thoughts are introduced in verse one and
then are expanded upon by verse 14. As I have said, the wording of John 1:1 is finely
Watchtower Society interchange: Recently a member of the Jehovah's
Witnesses and I exchanged a lot of e-mail messages about beliefs and doctrines. Here are
questions he asked and responses I gave. In essence, this is a blog of our conversations. There
will be some overlapping of material since the email conversation occasionally circled back on
One of the sad things about our email exchanges is that my Jehovah's
Witness friend rarely asked me a follow-up question. So we had very few real "conversations" in
which we discussed anything in-depth.