|
1
|
- Howard Culbertson
- Southern Nazarene University
- Cultural Anthropology
|
|
2
|
- Assume that all cultures developed along one unilinear path
- Line up all cultures on a single development or “success” scale
- See cultures progressing upward toward perfection
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Student of American Indian cultures
- A founder of “anthropology” as
scientific field of study
|
|
5
|
- Morgan was contemporary of biologist Charles Darwin (1809-1882)
|
|
6
|
- Morgan saw all cultures evolving
through three stages
- Savagery
- Barbarism
- Civilization
|
|
7
|
- Every element of culture moves from simple to complex
- From “primitive” (tribal) to “civilized” (modern Western)
|
|
8
|
- Higher civilization
- Civilization
- Lower civilization
- Higher barbarism
- Barbarism
- Lower barbarism
- Higher savagery
- Savagery
- Lower savagery
|
|
9
|
- “Cultural evolution” thought focuses on material cultural products
- Example: Morgan traced “evolution” of dwellings
|
|
10
|
- Is culture only -- or even essentially -- technology and material
products?
- What about worldviews?
- What about language?
|
|
11
|
- Modern Western culture is held up as the pinnacle of cultural
development
- Analysis made from etic viewpoint
|
|
12
|
- “They” are not very good at what we are best at
- By evaluating “them” on what we are best at, we miss what they handle
more competently than we
|
|
13
|
- Cultural evolution models lump together all societies displaying certain
characteristics
|
|
14
|
- Cultural Evolution often posits a progressive rise in human rationality
- Some cultures get labeled as “child-like” and others as “mature” in
their thinking
- Assumes primitive / developed languages
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Paul Hiebert: “Are modern people
really all that logical? Did (or do) tribals think in simplistic,
prelogical terms?”
|